Dangerous online challenges

In each edition of the BIK bulletin, we look at a topical issue – in the latestedition, we look at online challenges from the perspectives of various stakeholders. Geert Reynders, who lost his son Tim to a dangerous online challenge, shares his views on the issue and on how different actors can play their part in ensuring young people remain safe online. His perspective is complemented with that of the European network of Safer Internet Centres, young people, educators, researchers and industry.

Tide Pod challenge, Bottle Flip challenge, Blue Whale challenge, #InMyFeelings challenge, Momo challenge… new online challenges emerge regularly and quickly proliferate on social media, particularly among children and young people. They range from positive, helpful and funny to frightening, potentially harmful and even fatal. But why are they so popular? What are the possible risks they entail? And how can we ensure that children and young people, and all internet users, remain safe?
Children and young people challenging themselves and each other is not a new phenomenon; it existed well before digital technologies appeared in our daily lives. What has changed since then, however, is that the digital space has allowed challenges to spread more widely, reaching a much larger audience rapidly, both in terms of people becoming aware of the challenges and having a platform to share their participation in such activities. Social media have increased our tendency to show ourselves and our daily lives online. Peer pressure also plays a major role: online users, especially younger ones, seek to both imitate and impress their friends, because it makes them feel like they belong to a certain group. 
When it comes to the riskier challenges, they can also be a way for young people to test their own limits. But in some extreme cases, they can become dangerous and potentially fatal. In May 2017, Geert and Anita Reynders' son, Tim, lost his life after trying the "choking game" alone at home; an act of suffocating on purpose – in which participants cut off the blood supply from the brain to trigger a warm, fuzzy feeling – which can have potentially fatal consequences. 
Foundation T.I.M.
Following on from Tim's death, Geert and Anita started an initiative to raise awareness of dangerous online challenges among parents and young people, giving interviews to national newspapers and appearing on national television and radio. During that time, they received several letters from other parents who had been through similarly tragic events, but did not have the energy to bring this issue out into the open, or indeed had been advised against it.
In June 2017, Geert and Anita announced their intention to bring together a group of experts to shed light on the topic of dangerous online challenges, and asked volunteers to join them. 
Several months later, they launched T.I.M. (Tegen Internet Misstanden, which means "Against Internet Abuse" in Dutch). Through this Foundation, they provide parents and professionals with accessible information, publish a newsletter about emerging challenges and their potentially dangerous consequences (informed by a medical team), and are also working on an information movie. They strive to spread their message through social (Facebook, Instagram and Twitter) and conventional media (television, radio, newspapers).
Their work is now focusing on informing young people directly, although there is a delicate balance to reach in that regard: how do you warn young people about certain online challenges without piquing their curiosity and giving them bad ideas? That is why Foundation T.I.M. seeks to raise awareness of dangerous online challenges by establishing a constant dialogue with young people themselves.
Key insights on online challenges
Foundation T.I.M. recently conducted its first piece of research together with Jong & Je Wil Wat. For this study, a power session of three hours was organised with a group of 15 young people aged 13-18. It showed that the young people surveyed know many online challenges, distinguishing them based on their impact and danger level. In this study, online challenges were therefore found to fall into three categories:
  • Innocent, harmless challenges such as the bottle flip challenge.
  • Challenges that start out innocently, but can end up dangerously, such as the cinnamon challenge.
  • Challenges that are clearly dangerous right from the start, such as the Momo challenge (although, despite the reported severity, in the case of Momo it was found to be a hoax as there are no known cases of young people suffering harm as a result of it).
Young people mentioned YouTube, Reddit, Facebook, Instagram, Dumpert and Twitter as channels for online challenges. They reported participating in these for several reasons:
  • Tension/sensation – the dangerous element of a challenge makes it attractive and almost "addictive" to participate in.
  • Curiosity – trying out something new.
  • Strengthening friendships – sharing your participation with friends and thereby feeling a sense of "belonging".
  • Increasing their popularity – getting attention from others, in the form of more views, likes and followers on social media.
Participation in online challenges is also facilitated by the fact that the requirements for performing such challenges is usually easily within reach. Moreover, you do not need any particular talent to perform a challenge. Lastly, the potential danger of a challenge is systematically underestimated because participating in it did not have dangerous consequences for others. A 15-year-old girl surveyed summarised this as follows: "a challenge is actually the same as bungee jumping or fireworks. Although you know it is dangerous, you think: it only happens to 1 in 1,000 people when it goes wrong. That won't happen to me".
The young person's environment can also play a role in inciting young people to participate in an online challenge, since participation can take place in groups and/or under the influence of others. Friends and family play an important role, as they can encourage the young person to participate in a challenge (for example, by tagging or nominating). Influencers can also encourage a young person to take up an online challenge, particularly when they have a large reach and act as role models for young people. The young people surveyed also thought that school professionals and parents are not sufficiently aware of online challenges, and do not talk about it enough with children and young people. Furthermore they added that an effective prevention approach should not consist of banning online challenges, but instead warning young people about their dangers through conversations.
See the full June 2019 edition of the BIK bulletin to hear more from Geert (including audio clips) and find out more about the perspectives and responsibilities of various stakeholders in protecting children and young people from dangerous online challenges.

Related news

BIK bulletin: focus on positive online content

In each edition of the BIK bulletin, we look at a topical issue – this September 2019, on the occasion of the Positive Online Content Awareness Month, we delve into positive online content: what it is, why it is necessary, how children (aged 0-12) can benefit from it, and how its production and mainstreaming can be facilitated to reach as many users as possible. In doing so, the present BIK bulletin will feature the perspectives of the different groups that have a stake in positive online content: young people, parents and carers, teachers and other educational staff, content producers, policy makers and the research community.

Advice for schools on responding to online challenges

  • Awareness
  • 28/06/2019
  • UK Safer Internet Centre

Online challenges and crazes have become a key trend to be aware of when supporting and educating young people about how to stay safe online. Challenges come in many forms and can involve upsetting, harmful or viral content. Over the last few years we have seen a range of online challenges. Some, such as the ASL Ice Bucket Challenge and the No Makeup Selfie, can promote and raise money for great causes. However, other challenges such as "pain challenges", and "Neck Nominate" videos can harm young people and adults who take part. It is important that – whether a challenge is rumoured or real – educators have the tools they need and are ready to deal with such challenges and are able to support young people.

But isn't that dangerous? Most probably! An opinion piece by BIK Youth Ambassadors

What's the difference between a rational adult and a teenager? Nowadays, the answer may lie within one's reaction to being challenged with eating dish soap or spraying aerosol gasses into a lighter flame while indoors. This article aims to capture the youth angle on the issue of viral online challenges and the motives behind the seemingly irrational behaviours of many young people across the globe. To this end, we have interviewed three Better Internet for Kids (BIK) Youth Ambassadors. The valuable insights and observations they provided established the basis of this article, and shed light on how young people see this new trend of online challenges.

Digital ghost stories; impact, risks and reasons

  • Awareness
  • 03/05/2019
  • UK Safer Internet Centre

In February 2019, the "Momo Suicide Challenge" caused worry in homes and schools across the United Kingdom. Fuelled by sensationalist headlines and misinformation on social media, the hoax quickly escalated into a moral panic with parents fearing for the safety of their children.

Insafe insights...

The "Insafe insights…" series of reports draws on the experience and expertise of the Insafe network of Safer Internet Centres (SICs) in Europe to tackle some of the most topical issues encountered in its day-to-day operations.